FHA and conventional loans are among the two most common alternatives homebuyers turn to when they seek funding to move forward with their purchases. While you may use either one to purchase a new home, you may also use them to refinance an existing mortgage. Looking at the conventional vs. FHA loan comparison closely before determining which one might work better for you is important because each loan comes with notable differences.

What Is an FHA Loan?

Backed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), FHA-approved private lenders across the U.S. provide FHA loans. The FHA insures mortgages to safeguard the interest of lenders in case borrowers default on their loans. FHA insures mortgages on single-family homes and multifamily properties alike. However, the home you purchase will need to serve as your primary residence.

People with less-than-perfect creditworthiness who feel they might not qualify for conventional mortgages might benefit by looking at what FHA loans have to offer because they come with less stringent credit score requirements.

What is a Conventional Loan?

Most conventional loans meet the requirements prescribed by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae, and you may also refer to the ones that do as conforming loans. However, they do not come with any type of government-backed guarantee. Unlike FHA loans that you may use to buy only primary residences, you may use the proceeds from a conventional loan to purchase a second home or an investment property.

Conventional loans that do not meet Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae guidelines surrounding aspects such as maximum loan amounts, applicants’ incomes, down payment requirements, and credit standards fall under the non-conforming loans bracket. Jumbo loans classify as non-conforming loans. Non-conforming loans tend to have a smaller market and come with higher-than-usual interest rates.